|
Reflections on the
Salt Lake City Conference
TAMARA MAZZEI and GEORGINE
OLSON reflect on the TAMARA MAZZEI "Saving civilization is a big job. We've all got to work at it." —Judith Merkle Riley When I originally offered to report on the first North American conference of the HNS, I wasn't aware that so many authors were planning to sign up for an editor appointment, leaving me with only enough time to attend one session. So, in lieu of describing all the wonderful panels (and I know there were many—everyone I spoke with was just delighted with them), I can only add my general impressions. First and foremost, from my point of view, it was a smashing success. Sarah Johnson, Ann Chamberlin, Claire Morris, and everyone else involved did an excellent job on what was, by far, the most interesting conference I have ever attended—and the most fun. How can you top getting to meet long-time e-mail friends like Teresa Eckford in person, knowing that you can chat about the best primary sources for researching King Stephen as easily as you can chat about your pets or your families? And apart from the joy I felt in meeting like-minded souls who don't greet the words "historical novels" with a quizzical stare, I was also excited by what I perceive as indications of a positive trend. From the moment I decided to concentrate my publishing efforts on historical fiction, I hoped to find a path to success publishing in a niche that often receives pejorative labels and negative attention from the mainstream. In fact, I've often felt as if I were searching for an elusive, un-nameable stream, with no certainty it was there. Like anyone who reads the Historical Novels Review and Solander, I am aware of the variety of historical fiction that is being published all the time. But what the conference brought home to me is the incredible range of material this "genre" can include—and where it is going. And yes, I believe it is going somewhere—somewhere very good. I feel this way for a number of reasons, but the diversity of material I saw at the HNS conference is reflective of what, to my mind, is the most important reason: historical fiction is finally beginning to coalesce into a distinctive entity—I hesitate to use the word "genre" simply because it often implies a strict definition of type, and historical fiction will never be defined so narrowly in any way other than by the boundaries of time. The conference provided an excellent opportunity to see this coalescence in action. I spoke with so many authors known for writing "romances" or "mysteries," who have written something historical—some falling into the strict confines of an existing genre, and some not; but all with an overriding passion and knowledge about the stories they want to bring to the world. Knowledge and passion are important, of course, yet even more so for those of us who love it, is the growing awareness that the words "historical fiction" do not denote "bodice rippers" or arguably worse, the Cliffs Notes version of the "real" history that some of us avoided in school. These stories and the ways that we tell them are an essential part of our culture. They are not history "light;" they are literature, a point made very nicely by Jack Whyte in his Friday night speech. For me, a high point of the conference was in the single session I did manage to attend, which focused on bridging the gap between modern readers and the primary sources many authors need to use for research. It was led by Judith Merkle Riley, one of my all-time favorite authors, who brought photocopied examples from The Book of Margery Kempe, Chaucer, Nostradamus, and The Paston Letters. She described some of the ways that authors can absorb and synthesize their sources so that they don’t lose their original disposition, but can still be appreciated by modern readers. This is heady stuff for anyone who has struggled to shed the image that historical fiction requires less intellectual rigor than other types of fiction (add a knight in shining armor, a ripping bodice or two, a bit of flowery dialogue, and boom; you have a novel). Judith Merkle Riley was joking when she said the words that appear at the beginning of this article, and yet, they have stayed with me because they were an echo of many similar sentiments I heard expressed during the conference. I went away with the feeling that all of us, whether we are the tellers of the stories, or the audience who gratefully receives them, have begun to realize the value of these tales and how important it is that we not allow them to fall by the wayside simply because the mainstream has run a different course for a while. Listening to Jack Whyte speak of his own passion for stories, to Rachel Kahan describe her work with the Jean Plaidy estate to re-issue those much-loved books, to the authors with whom I had appointments telling me of novels set in Dutch Colonial Jakarta, ancient Rome, prehistoric Britain, early modern France, and countless others, I began to feel as if my divining rod is very near to finding water—not a stream, but a river! GEORGINE OLSON For the life of me, I can’t remember what made me decide to
attend the Historical Novel Society Conference in Salt Lake City, Utah,
this spring – but I’m so glad I did! I’m not even sure I thought I’d be
getting more than food for my reader’s soul, but I sure did. Those who
decided not to attend what they felt would be purely a writer’s conference
really missed out on an informative and energizing experience. ______________________________________________ First published in Solander: The Magazine of the Historical Novel Society, v.9 no.1 (May 2005): 34-36.. |